top of page

Intersectionality and Obesity

Intersectionality and Obesity

Obesity is a significant global public health issue with notable social disparities. An intersectional analysis considers the interconnectedness of race, gender, and socioeconomic status, contributing to a better understanding of obesity's unequal distribution among populations. Addressing disparities in obesity prevalence requires comprehensive, targeted policies and interventions that consider intersectionality. Strategies include improving access to healthy foods, enhancing opportunities for physical activity, providing culturally appropriate education and support, addressing socioeconomic inequalities, and promoting healthy body image and mental well-being. By adopting an intersectional approach, we can work towards reducing obesity disparities and improving the health of all individuals, regardless of their background.

Obesity: An Intersectional Analysis of a Complex Health Issue


Obesity has become a major public health concern worldwide, affecting millions of people and leading to numerous health complications, such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and certain types of cancer (World Health Organization [WHO], 2020). While obesity is a complex issue influenced by various biological, environmental, and behavioral factors, an intersectional analysis can help us better understand the social disparities that contribute to the unequal distribution of obesity across different populations. Intersectionality is a theoretical framework that considers the interconnected nature of social categories such as race, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and other factors that contribute to health disparities (Crenshaw, 1989).

Race and Ethnicity

Racial and ethnic disparities in obesity prevalence are well-documented, with minority populations, such as African Americans and Hispanics, having higher rates of obesity compared to non-Hispanic whites in the United States (Ogden et al., 2020). Factors contributing to these disparities include differences in socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, and the built environment (Kumanyika, 2019). For example, minority populations are more likely to live in neighborhoods with fewer supermarkets and limited access to fresh fruits and vegetables, which may contribute to the consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods (Larson et al., 2009).


Gender disparities in obesity are also evident, with women generally having higher obesity rates than men in many countries (WHO, 2020). The relationship between gender and obesity is complex, influenced by biological factors such as hormones, as well as social factors like cultural norms and expectations around body image (Sweeting, 2008). Additionally, women, particularly those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, may face barriers to engaging in physical activity due to caregiving responsibilities and limited access to safe and affordable exercise facilities (Guthold et al., 2018).

Socioeconomic Status

Socioeconomic status plays a significant role in shaping obesity disparities, with lower-income individuals and those with lower levels of education being at a higher risk of obesity (Krueger et al., 2015). Limited financial resources can restrict access to healthy foods and opportunities for physical activity, contributing to higher rates of obesity among lower-SES individuals (Drewnowski & Almiron-Roig, 2010). Moreover, lower-income neighborhoods may have fewer parks, sidewalks, and recreational facilities, which can further limit opportunities for physical activity (Lovasi et al., 2009).

Intersectional Approaches

Recognizing the interconnected nature of race, gender, and SES, an intersectional approach can help to identify and address the unique challenges faced by different populations in their efforts to maintain a healthy weight. For example, a study by Ailshire and House (2011) found that the social disparities in BMI trajectories among American adults are shaped by the complex interplay of race, gender, and SES, emphasizing the importance of considering these factors when developing policies and interventions to address obesity.

Policy Implications and Interventions

To address the disparities in obesity prevalence across different populations, a comprehensive approach that considers the intersectionality of race, gender, and SES is needed. Such an approach could involve the following strategies:

Improve access to healthy foods:

Increasing access to affordable, healthy foods in low-income and minority neighborhoods is essential for reducing obesity disparities. This can be achieved through policies and interventions that promote the establishment of supermarkets, farmer's markets, and community gardens in these areas (Larson et al., 2009).

Enhance opportunities for physical activity:

Ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their race, gender, or SES, have access to safe and affordable opportunities for physical activity is crucial.

Provide culturally appropriate education and support:

Tailoring obesity prevention and intervention programs to meet the specific needs and cultural contexts of different populations is vital. This may involve working with community leaders and organizations to develop culturally sensitive health promotion materials, as well as providing language and literacy-appropriate resources (Kumanyika et al., 2012).

Address socioeconomic inequalities:

Tackling the underlying socioeconomic factors that contribute to obesity disparities, such as poverty and limited access to education, is essential. Policies aimed at reducing income inequality and improving educational opportunities for marginalized populations can help address the root causes of obesity disparities (Krueger et al., 2015).

Promote healthy body image and mental well-being:

Addressing cultural norms and expectations around body image, particularly for women, is important in promoting healthy weight management. Initiatives that challenge societal standards of beauty and promote positive body image, as well as mental health support services, can help reduce the risk of obesity and its associated health complications (Sweeting, 2008).


Obesity is a complex health issue with significant social disparities that can be better understood through an intersectional analysis. Recognizing the interconnected nature of race, gender, and socioeconomic status in shaping obesity prevalence can help inform the development of comprehensive and targeted policies and interventions that address the unique challenges faced by different populations. By taking an intersectional approach, we can work towards reducing obesity disparities and improving the health and well-being of all individuals, regardless of their race, gender, or socioeconomic background.


Ailshire, J. A., & House, J. S. (2011). The Unequal Burden of Weight Gain: An Intersectional Approach to Understanding Social Disparities in BMI Trajectories from 1986 to 2001/2002. Social Forces, 90(2), 397-423.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.

Drewnowski, A., & Almiron-Roig, E. (2010). Human perceptions and preferences for fat-rich foods. In Montmayeur, J. P., le Coutre, J. (Eds.), Fat Detection: Taste, Texture, and Post Ingestive Effects (pp. 265-290). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2018). Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. The Lancet Global Health, 6(10), e1077-e1086.

Krueger, P. M., Reither, E. N., & Peppard, P. E. (2015). Cumulative exposure to economic hardship and obesity. SSM – Population Health, 1, 60-67.

Kumanyika, S. K., Whitt-Glover, M. C., Haire-Joshu, D., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2012). Best practices for obesity prevention in racial/ethnic minority communities. In Kumanyika, S. K., Parker, L., Sim, L. J. (Eds.), Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Framework to Inform Decision Making (pp. 361-402). National Academies Press.

Larson, N. I., Story, M. T., & Nelson, M. C. (2009). Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(1), 74-81.

Lovasi, G. S., Hutson, M. A., Guerra, M., & Neckerman, K. M. (2009). Built environments and obesity in disadvantaged populations. Epidemiologic Reviews, 31(1), 7-20.

Ogden, C. L., Fryar, C. D., Hales, C. M., Carroll, M. D., Aoki, Y., & Freedman, D. S. (2020). Differences in Obesity Prevalence by Demographics and Urbanization in US Children and Adolescents, 2013-2016. JAMA, 319(23), 2410-2418.

Sweeting, H. (2008). Gendered dimensions of obesity in childhood and adolescence. Nutrition Journal, 7(1), 1-14.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Obesity and overweight. Retrieved from

Kumanyika, S. (2019). Health disparities research in global perspective: new insights and new directions. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 1-20.


bottom of page